Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: 226308
I write in connection with your request for information which was received on 31st January 2023. Please find below the response to your request:
In respect of each of the last five calendar years how many Notices of Intended prosecutions issued for speeding offences have subsequently been cancelled due to administrative errors by West Mercia Police. What is the figure of cancellations as a percentage of the overall number of Notice of intended prosecutions issued for speeding offences.
Reply
Your request for information has been considered in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the Act”), and I am not obliged to provide the information requested.
S.12(1) of the Act states that a public authority is not obliged to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the “appropriate limit”. For police forces in England and Wales, the "appropriate limit" is £450 or 18 hours of work as set by the Freedom of Information (Fees and Appropriate Limit) Regulations 2004.
The information you have requested is not available in a readily retrievable format. In order to ascertain all admin errors would take in excess of 18 hours as each record would have to be checked individually.
In accordance with s.17(5) of the Act, this acts as a Refusal Notice.
Under s.16 of the Act I have a duty to provide advice and assistance in relation to your request. In the process of reviewing the request the information regarding burglary offences was retrieved, this information is contained on the attached table. and can provide the information requested for the majority of the question as this was retrieved during our initial research. This should not be taken as a precedent that additional information would be supplied outside of the time/fees legislation for any subsequent requests
From TPU (Traffic Processing Unit)
|
Cancellations |
|||||
|
|
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
|
Duplicate Notice |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Incorrect direction of travel |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Out of statutory time period for prosecution |
5 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
27 |
|
Process defect identified - see journal |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
TOR issued in error |
1 |
1 |
3 |
36 |
34 |
|
VRM Misread |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
Grand Total |
7 |
3 |
10 |
37 |
72 |
For speed camera enforcement (fixed and mobile) :-
|
Offence Year |
no. admin errors |
total no. offences |
%age admin errors |
|
2022 |
231 |
115085 |
0.20% |
|
2021 |
491 |
104216 |
0.47% |
|
2020 |
319 |
74105 |
0.43% |
|
2019 |
263 |
85344 |
0.31% |
|
2018 |
418 |
92490 |
0.45% |