Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: HRC0027517/26
I write in connection with your request for information which was received on 25th August 2026. Please find below the response to your request:
Under the Freedom of Information Act, please provide the following information.
For each calendar year 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026 to date, please provide the number of recorded robbery offences in which property recorded as stolen included a wristwatch/watch with a recorded value of:
For each of the above years, please also provide the combined recorded value of the watches stolen in these robbery offences.
For the 10 most recent robbery offences during this period in which a watch valued at £50,000 or more was recorded as stolen, please provide, where recorded:
Reply
West Mercia Police have conducted searches in relation to your request.
Caveats:
The property fields in the recording management system are not mandatory and so not always completed. Therefore, a keyword search was used as well as a search on the property code. However, if the brand of watch was included in the incident summary but not the keyword then, those offences would not be returned (ie ‘Rolex stolen’ compared to ‘Rolex watch stolen’). The incident summaries have been manually reviewed to eliminate false positives. Most false positives included the word ‘watching’ in the summary.
Unfortunately, value of a stolen item is not routinely recorded. Therefore, only if the values of the stolen items have been included in the incident summaries, have this been captured in the data table below.
Also, more than one watch may have been stolen in one offence. Therefore, the Issue table provides the number of offences only and not the number of watches.
For each calendar year 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026 to date, please provide the number of recorded robbery offences in which property recorded as stolen included a wristwatch/watch with a recorded value of:
|
Calendar Year |
Number of offences |
|
2023 |
23 |
|
2024 |
13 |
|
2025 |
8 |
|
2026 (Jan-Jul) |
6 |
|
Grand Total |
50 |
|
Anonymised crime reference |
Year |
Reported watch value |
|
CR001 |
2023 |
£30.00 |
|
CR002 |
2023 |
£3,000.00 |
|
CR003 |
2023 |
£10,000.00 |
|
CR004 |
2023 |
£34,000.00 |
|
CR005 |
2025 |
£8,000.00 |
|
CR006 |
2026 |
£250.00 |
NB: only 6 offences stated the watch value in the incident summaries.
For each of the above years, please also provide the combined recorded value of the watches stolen in these robbery offences.
For the 10 most recent robbery offences during this period in which a watch valued at £50,000 or more was recorded as stolen, please provide, where recorded:
No specific recorded information held. There were no watches over the value of £50,000 identified.