Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: HRC0032368/26
I write in connection with your request for information which was received on 28th September 2026. Please find below the response to your request:
Please provide me with the following information:
Reply
Your request for information has been considered in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the Act”), and I am not obliged to provide the information requested.
S.12(1) of the Act states that a public authority is not obliged to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the “appropriate limit”. For police forces in England and Wales, the "appropriate limit" is £450 or 18 hours of work as set by the Freedom of Information (Fees and Appropriate Limit) Regulations 2004.
The information you have requested is not available in a readily retrievable format in respect of question 3. The method of the spiking, if known, would likely be recorded within the incident summary. There are no separate categories or markers to denote the alleged method of spiking There are 997 records. In order to ascertain whether the information you have requested is held would take in excess of 18 hours as each record would have to be checked individually to extract this information.
In accordance with s.17(5) of the Act, this acts as a Refusal Notice.
However, in accordance with Section 16 of the Act I have a duty to provide advice and assistance in relation to your request and can provide the information requested for questions 1 and 2 as this was retrieved during our initial research. This should not be taken as a precedent that additional information would be supplied outside of the time/fees legislation for any subsequent requests.
.
|
Number of crimes with either a relevant Primary Offence Title or linked marker/tag by year and month report created |
Calendar year |
1 Jan - 31 Aug 2026 |
Grand Total |
||||
|
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
|||
|
January |
4 |
39 |
14 |
5 |
10 |
17 |
89 |
|
February |
1 |
18 |
12 |
9 |
20 |
12 |
72 |
|
March |
3 |
15 |
13 |
9 |
14 |
20 |
74 |
|
April |
27 |
18 |
17 |
9 |
18 |
89 |
|
|
May |
4 |
13 |
16 |
12 |
18 |
19 |
82 |
|
June |
6 |
15 |
15 |
8 |
15 |
16 |
75 |
|
July |
6 |
7 |
9 |
18 |
22 |
20 |
82 |
|
August |
6 |
14 |
16 |
4 |
12 |
29 |
81 |
|
September |
7 |
12 |
7 |
16 |
4 |
46 |
|
|
October |
13 |
16 |
17 |
14 |
12 |
72 |
|
|
November |
70 |
17 |
11 |
13 |
15 |
126 |
|
|
December |
47 |
12 |
20 |
15 |
15 |
109 |
|
|
Grand Total |
167 |
205 |
168 |
140 |
166 |
151 |
997 |
|
Number of crimes with either a relevant Primary Offence Title or linked marker/tag by year and outcome of investigation |
Calendar year |
1 Jan - 31 Aug 2026 |
Grand Total |
||||
|
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
|||
|
Type 1 - Charged/Summonsed/Postal Requisition |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
15 |
|
|
Type 1A - Charged/Summons - alternate offence. Offender has been charged under the alternate offence rule. |
1 |
1 |
2 |
||||
|
Type 3A - Caution Adult - alternate offence. Offender has been given a simple caution under the alternate offences rule. |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Type 8 - Community resolution (Crime) |
1 |
1 |
2 |
||||
|
Type 12 - Prosecution Prevented-Named Suspect Identified But Is Too Ill (Physical Or Mental Health) To Prosecute, or confirmed died either before crime reported or before enough evidence to charge |
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||
|
Type 13 - Prosecution Prevented-Named Suspect Identified But Victim Or Key Witness Is Dead Or Too Ill To Give Evidence |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|||
|
Type 14 - Evidential Difficulties Victim Based- Suspect Not Identified: Crime Confirmed But The Victim Either Declines Or Unable To Support Further Police Investigation To Identify The Offender |
33 |
55 |
36 |
19 |
31 |
23 |
197 |
|
Type 15 - Named Suspect Identified: Victim Supports Police Action But Evidential Difficulties Prevent Further Action |
20 |
24 |
18 |
25 |
25 |
18 |
130 |
|
Type 16 - Named Suspect Identified: Evidential Difficulties Prevent Further Action: Victim Does Not Support (Or Has Withdrawn Support From) Police Action |
24 |
9 |
15 |
25 |
27 |
25 |
125 |
|
Type 18 - Investigation Complete; No Suspect Identified. Crime Investigated As Far As Reasonably Possible-Case Closed Pending Further Investigative Opportunities Becoming Available |
86 |
114 |
95 |
64 |
76 |
46 |
481 |
|
Type 20 - Further action resulting from the crime report will be undertaken by another body or agency subject to the victim (or person acting on their behalf) being made aware of the act to be taken |
2 |
3 |
5 |
||||
|
Ongoing Investigation |
2 |
30 |
32 |
||||
|
Grand Total |
167 |
205 |
168 |
140 |
166 |
151 |
997 |